I don't think we need to worry too much about what Lovelock does and does not think, especially through reporting such as that..
For some actual climate change science, this paper went up yesterday: http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00649.1 Showing that the the last 50 years has seen warming like no other period over the last 1000 years in Australasia, and is very likely due to anthropogenic influence. Matt. On 17/05/12 7:53 AM, "Matheus Carvalho" <[email protected]> wrote: > Lovelock, the proposer of Gaia hypothesis, says his predictions (and others > also) were exaggerated: > > > http://www.examiner.com/article/gaia-author-james-lovelock-recants-on-global-w > arming > > > Matheus C. Carvalho > Senior Research Associate > Centre for Coastal Biogeochemistry > Southern Cross University > Lismore - Australia > http://www.angelfire.com/pa/ostro >
