Ecolog:

Pretty steep fees.

Journals can't exist without some form of financing, but the net effect of fees is to discourage publication by those whose institutions are on limited budgets or those who would have to pay out of their own pocket--except for those who are rather wealthy or perhaps desperate enough for recognition to pay up.

It would seem that the money would have to come from either publication fees, subscription fees, or organizations having some justification for footing the bill.

Have any studies been done on peer-reviewed journals and how they solve the financing riddle? Which ones make money and how do they make it?

WT

PS: Why do some journals hide their fee schedules rather than just say up-front what their fees are?


----- Original Message ----- From: "Chen, Hua" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Open peer review journal for Ecology


Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography (JEE) is one of the open access peer review journals for Ecology. Details refer to JEE website (http://omicsonline.org/jeehome.php).

Hua

**************************************************************
Hua Chen, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor, Biology Department
University of Illinois at Springfield
One University Plaza, HSB 230
Springfield, IL 62703 - 5407

Tel:  (217) 206 - 8339; Fax: (217) 206 - 7205
Email: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
**************************************************************


________________________________________
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news [[email protected]] on behalf of Zewei Song [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Open peer review journal for Ecology

Hi, Ecologgers

I was wondering if there is any open peer review journal in the field of
Ecology?

Thanks.

--
Zewei
University of Minnesota


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3838 - Release Date: 08/16/11

Reply via email to