Nice list but as far as your favorite definition I would 
Dear Warren,

Nice list but as far as your favorite definition I would personally delete the 
renewable word and keep only the first part.
I would prefer that at least ecologist would refrain from inserting the cost 
concept in the definition. The reason is that I think cost is impossible to 
estimate, it is an anthropocentric measure and it is a variable that doesn't 
reflect the health of a system ( e.g. the economic component on your balance 
could easily outweigh the environmental and social components as it is 
happening now). But maybe I am skeptical about your definition because it is 
not clear to me what falls under the non-renewable category. Most resources are 
currently depleted at a rate that makes them non-renewable.
I can't think of a "classic" non-renewable resource that could be depleted 
without breaking the first assertion anyway.
Regards

Francesca




________________________________
From: Warren W. Aney <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:44 AM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Case studies: food & energy sustainability

Wayne, there are hundreds of definitions being used for "sustainability" --
some even more ambiguous than the one Francesca suggests.  Here are some
more examples, some of which assume or imply that future technology will
bail us out:

"Meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their needs."  1987 Brundtland Report, Our Common
Future.

"When a process is sustainable, it can be carried out over and over without
negative environmental effects or impossibly high costs to anyone involved."

"Maintaining your consumption without eroding your capital."  Johannesburg
Summit Secretary-General Nitin Desai.

"Stabilizing resource exploitation while allowing the less privileged an
equitable share of our earth's bounty without compromising its livability."

"Providing the best outcomes for the human and natural environments both now
and into the indefinite future."

"Bearing in mind the effects of our actions on our descendants for seven
generations."  Iroquois Confederacy

Hargroves & Smith 2005:
.    Deal cautiously with risk, uncertainty and irreversibility. 
.    Ensure appropriate valuation, appreciation and restoration of
nature. 
.    Integrate environmental, social and economic goals in policies and
activities. 
.    Provide equal opportunity and community participation/Sustainable
community. 
.    Conserve biodiversity and ecological integrity. 
.    Ensure inter-generational equity. 
.    Recognize the global dimension. 
.    Commit to best practice. 
.    Allow no net loss of human capital or natural capital. 
.    Abide by the principle of continuous improvement. 
.    Meet the need for good governance. 

"In a sustainable society, nature is not subject to systematically
increasing:
1.    concentrations of substances extracted from the Earth's crust; 
2.    concentrations of substances produced by society; 
3.    degradation by physical means
and, in that society. . . 
4.    the ability for humans to meet their needs is not systematically
undermined."
The Natural Step Framework

"Sustainability means using, developing and protecting resources at a rate
and in a manner that enables people to meet their current needs and also
provides that future generations can meet their own needs. Sustainability
requires simultaneously meeting environmental, economic and community
needs." State of Oregon's Sustainability Act

"To maintain forever the current productivity of renewable resource systems
including soils, waters, forests, wildlands and the atmosphere; and to
deplete nonrenewable resources only at the rate that cost-equivalent
substitutes can be developed, with costs measured on economic, social and
ecological scales."

Sustainability:  "An activity that is performed in such a way that the
object of the activity will renew itself or be renewable in a time-frame
that does not diminish the source."  Kelly Stettner, Black River Action
Team, Springfield, VT

"A thing is sustainable when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability
and beauty of the biotic community.  It is not sustainable when it tends
otherwise."  Paraphrasing Aldo Leopold

***********
Here's the definition I like best (so far):
"To maintain forever the current integrity, stability and productivity of
renewable resource systems including soils, waters, forests, wildlands and
the atmosphere; and to deplete nonrenewable resources only at the rate that
cost-equivalent substitutes can be developed, with costs measured on
economic, social and ecological scales."

Warren W. Aney
Senior Wildlife Ecologist
Tigard, Oregon

-----Original Message-----
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, 26 July, 2011 14:49
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Case studies: food & energy sustainability

Dear Wayne,
I am sure it can be defined in various ways and it is possible to give it a
more or less ecological, social or ethical twist. 

What I came up with thinking of a "dry" scientific definition is:
"Sustainability is what guarantees that life supporting systems keep
functioning over time"
Looking forward to comments and other definitions.
Francesca



________________________________
From: Wayne Tyson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Case studies: food & energy sustainability

Honorable Forum and Francesca:

Please define, in scientific terms, sustainability.

Thanks,

WT


----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 2:15 AM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Case studies: food & energy sustainability


The Story of Stuff Project has put together and made avai
Dear Shelly,

The Story of Stuff Project has put together and made available for download
some teaching material on sustainability that might give you some nice ideas
(I think it's for high school but likely it can be adapted to higher
education):
http://www.facingthefuture.org/Curriculum/BuyUseToss/tabid/469/Default.aspx
The movies series:

http://storyofstuff..org/about.php

Also the "No impact" project as put togheter some downoadable material for
educators including lessons on food and energy:
http://noimpactproject.org/educators-middle-high-school-environment-curricul
um-html/

For success stories aroud the world (including the desert) I strongly
suggest to look through the list of permaculture initiatives:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_permaculture_projects
Or the tranistion town initiatives:
http://www.transitionnetwork.org/

Surely when talking of energy students should get a good grasp on the peak
oil concept and its consequences and for this the Post Carbon Institute
should be resourceful:
http://www.postcarbon.org/issue/13910-education
As it would be any lesson available on youtube from Richard Heinberg, the
Post Carbon Reader book might provide some good material:

http://www.postcarbon.org/book/161233-the-post-carbon-reader


Other resources specifically on diet and food:
Big organizations reports on impact of diet:
FAO
2006:
http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/0612sp1.htm
UNEP 2010:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jun/02/un-report-meat-free-diet
Food energy consumption statistics:
http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Aug97/livestock.hrs.htmlDocumentaries:
Meat the thruth; Food Inc; Fast Food Nation; The world according to
Monsanto; The future of food interview and others with Vandana Shiva;
Books: The food revolution (John Robbins), Eating animals (Jonathan Safran
Foer);
For fisheries: The "End of the line documentary"; The Good Catch manual:
http://www.seafoodchoices.com/whatwedo/TheGoodCatchManual.pdf.pdf;


And when talking about sustainability and the big picture it would be
essential to consider looking at material on new types of economy:
http://steadystate.org/discover/video-audio-and-presentations/
http://steadystate.org/foreword-enough-is-enough/
http://www.neweconomics.org/about

For bad case studies, after going through the above material, my guess is
that there is no need for field trips, just ask the students to look around
in their classroom or home, look in their fridge, switch on their tv, walk
outside the door or go to a shopping mall!


Kind regards

Francesca

Reply via email to