Do you mean literally without fish, or simply streams where exploitable fish 
like salmon and trout were absent before stocking?  Are there streams in 
western Canada that are literally fishless?  I thought sculpins and 
sticklebacks between them occurred pretty much throughout.  Please correct me 
if I am mistaken/

mcneely

---- "Emily M. Whattam" <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Hello all,
> 
> I am conducting the first field season of my Ph.D. this May and will be 
> surveying Harlequin Duck densities on breeding streams with and without fish 
> in British Columbia and Alberta (see below for a brief project description).
> 
> I am looking for any tips for potential field sites. I am particularly 
> interested in tips regarding possible locations of fishless Harlequin Duck 
> breeding streams, since we suspect that these will be more difficult to find.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any suggestions for potential field sites, or 
> ideas of people I should contact.
> 
> Much thanks,
> 
> Emily
> 
> PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
> 
> Harlequin duck populations have experienced a slow decline for decades, 
> particularly in Eastern Canada. Population surveys show that recruitment is 
> too low to offset mortality. The widespread introduction of fish to 
> historically fishless breeding streams may be responsible. The presence of 
> fish lowers the availability of aquatic invertebrates by altering 
> anti-predator behaviours including downstream drift, daytime hiding, and 
> nocturnal activity. Lower availability of this key resource may lead to 
> higher female mortality during incubation, or lower productivity or juvenile 
> survival. Both Harlequins and fish are found in higher densities in regions 
> with high invertebrate abundance, but their presences are negatively 
> correlated. As such, breeding streams containing fish may be of lower quality 
> and able to support fewer nesting females than fishless streams. I will 
> determine whether fish lower the quality of breeding streams by quantifying 
> invertebrate abundance, female condit!
 io!
>  n, clutch size, hatching success, fledging success and mean productivity of 
> Harlequins nesting on paired streams with and without fish.
> 
> Emily M. Whattam 
> Ph.D. Student 
> Centre for Wildlife Ecology, TASC 2 8540 
> Simon Fraser University 
> Department of Biological Sciences 
> 8888 University Drive 
> Burnaby BC Canada  V5C 1S6
> (778) 926-5440

--
David McNeely

Reply via email to