Dear Ecologgers:

Many thanks to those who replied directly to me about the likelihood that this 
was a legitimate pre-journal-submission review for EPA.  It turns out that the 
person requesting this review was following the established protocol for 
requesting outside reviews, which currently appears to provide very little 
information to potential reviewers.  After specifically indicating to the 
requester the reasons for my concerns, I was told that they are now 
re-examining the specifics of how they make these requests.

It would appear I am the first crazy person they have asked to review one of 
their manuscripts.

My apologies for any inconveniences my post may have caused, and thanks again 
to those who provided insight into federal peer review.


Regards,

Gary

 

Reply via email to