We discussed the double blind system at Herpetological Conservation and Biology, however, we could find no other journal in biology that did it at the time (2005). So, we opted for the traditional system, although I really wanted to do double blind anyway. The problem was that we were concerned that some submitters may not understand what it is and we were doing so many other new things, we had to have some stuff traditional. I am unaware of any journal in ecology or biology that does double blind reviews, however, it is commonplace in some other fields. I believe that some ecology journals have blind peer review in which the reviewers are identified after completion of the process, but I can't recall which ones.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Gonzalez-Abraham Charlotte<[email protected]> wrote: > I'm looking for Ecology and Evolution journals that have a peer review and > double-blind revision system. Can you help me? > > Thanks a lot, > Charlotte > > > > > -- Malcolm L. McCallum Associate Professor of Biology Managing Editor, Herpetological Conservation and Biology Texas A&M University-Texarkana Fall Teaching Schedule: Vertebrate Biology - TR 10-11:40; General Ecology - MW 1-2:40pm; Forensic Science - W 6-9:40pm Office Hourse- TBA 1880's: "There's lots of good fish in the sea" W.S. Gilbert 1990's: Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss, and pollution. 2000: Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction MAY help restore populations. 2022: Soylent Green is People! Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
