I am not familiar with this book, but I think that I will go and read it.

I do think that sometimes people get really upset at things that don't 
really matter when you look at the big picture.  For example, sometimes when 
I am driving down the highway and I am finished with my pop, I throw the can 
out the window on to the side of the highway.  I realize that this is really 
rude, and it probably upsets a lot of people, but does it reallly have any 
environmental impact at all, relatively speaking?

I am of course joking, I don't really do this, but seriously, compare the 
impact of littering the side of the highway with garbage, with the impact 
all of the other things that I am doing at the time, and
all of the other things that have been done to the environment to allow me 
to be in that situation at that point in time (ie driving down a paved 
highway in my car, burning gas and drinking a coke out of an aluminum can).

Of the top of my head, the things that have impacted the envrionment 
include: building the highway, building the car, all the energy used to 
build the highway and the car, the impacts of extracting and refining the 
raw materials to build the highway and the car, extracting and refining the 
gas powering my car, the emissions from my car while driving it and in all 
of the aforementioned extraction and manufacturing processes, mining and 
smelting the aluminum, transporting the aluminum to the can manufacturing 
plant, growing and refining the sugar that gets added to the pop, 
manufacturing the pop and filling the can with it, the emissions from 
transporting the pop can to the store where I bought it from, etc., etc., 
etc.

The fact that the can ends up on the side of the road as garbage, while 
creating a small visual
impact, accounts for what, .01% of the environmental impact of all of my 
activities at that time and all the activities that lead to me being in that 
situation?  Yet most people would consider littering to be a large 
environmental sin, but probably wouldn't even think of all the other things 
that I mentioned as any sort of sin at all.

Of course, to NOT do all of those other things, like driving my car where I 
want when I want with the ability to get an easy caffiene buzz anywhere 
along the way, would really be quite inconvenient.  It's really much easier 
to keep the empty can and put it in the recycle bin at the next gas station, 
even though this action probably does almost nothing, environmentally 
speaking.  At this point, I still recycle my cans because I don't know what 
else to do and because it is so much easier to get my beverages 
pre-packaged, but I know that there are more effective things that I could 
do.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wendee Holtcamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 7:41 PM
Subject: Consumer Choice & the Environment


 > Is anyone familiar with the book "The Consumer's Guide to Effective
 > Environmental Choices: Practical Advice from the Union of Concerned
 > Scientists"? (circa 1999)? It analyzes the environmental impacts (air and
 > water pollution, global warming impact and habitat/land consumption/use)
 > for
 > various consumer choices and says which ones are having the biggest
 > impacts,
 > and which are not so much making a hill of beans of difference (paper
 > napkins, disposable diapers).
 >
 > They used a computational model to analyze it all, but I wonder if there
 > is
 > any more recent study that may have come out or of anyone reviewed their
 > methods etc and found them faulty? I talked with Brower and he has not
 > done
 > a more recent model and is working in a different field now and so was
 > unfamiliar with current work.
 >
 > Deadline next week.
 > Wendee

_________________________________________________________________
Have Some Fun Out Of The Sun This March Break 
http://local.live.com/?mkt=en-ca/?v=2&cid=A6D6BDB4586E357F!142

Reply via email to