Kenneth Hoste <[email protected]> writes: > On 20/11/2018 07:43, Loris Bennett wrote: >> >> Yes, I can see that --ignore-checksums isn't ideal, particularly with >> something like R with over 600 packages. It might be useful to be able >> to configure how many failing checksums can be ignored before the >> install aborts. > > Maybe support only ignoring checksums for specific things? > > I can imagine we can extend the existing --ignore-checksums to support > something > like --ignore-checksums=mgcv,foo,bar. > > That makes more sense to me... Thoughts?
To me, too :-) -- Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.) ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email [email protected]
