* Ronciak, John ([email protected]) wrote: > Some list removed for now
Hi John, Thanks for the reply. > What do the HW stats for the failing port say? > Is it receiving what it thinks are packets that a problem in some way? I'm fairly sure they weren't incrementing at all, and I took a tcpdump that was showing nothing coming from the e100's at that point. Let me know which counters/debug to collect and I'll be happy to gather it. > Is there a way to change the MTU being used on the camera that is causing the > problem? The camera doesn't give me much in the way of options (I'm reasonably sure it's an embedded Linux of some form - but it doesn't let me at it) If I change the MTU on my end of the link I guess it might follow? > Does moving the problem camera link to the other e100 port work? Note that the camera isn't on the e100 port - the camera is on the Tulip; the PCs that are watching the cameras output are on the e100 ports, but it's the e100 ports that are stopping, and if I move the PCs to another tulip port all works fine. > Does the dmesg show anything else happening when the problem comes up? Nope, nothing else. Dave -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
