On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 06:53:47PM +0200, Mark Phalan wrote: > Are the padding rules supposed to be consistent between the compiler and > dtrace on x64? > > > # cat /tmp/s.d > ... > > # cat /tmp/s.d > ...
Did you mean to catn /tmp/x.c and /tmp/s.d? > $ cc -m64 /tmp/x.c -o /tmp/x Dunno what x.c contains... I'm assuming something very similar to what s.d contains. > $ /tmp/x > my_data: 16 > more_data: 24 > offset: 8 > > # dtrace -qs /tmp/s.d > my_data: 16 > more_data: 20 > offset: 4 > > Bug? Probably, I think. The code here is all 64-bit, so differences in alignment in ILP32 vs. LP64 cannot be the problem. Nico -- _______________________________________________ dtrace-discuss mailing list dtrace-discuss@opensolaris.org
