On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Hilton Gibson <hilton.gib...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> ​We are implementing ORCID with our DSpace 5.2 using the XMLUI.​
> ​We are not clear what the purpose of the "index-authority" script is?​
> ​See:
> http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/index.php/SUNScholar/Researcher_Identification/5.X/ORCID#Step_5_-_Import_existing_authorities_.28Optional.29
>
> Does the DSpace authority record for an eperson have precedence over the
> ORCID record?
> If I believe that the existing "eperson" records are not accurate and
> authoritative, should I run this script?
>

Hi Hilton,

first, authors (the metadata field) or authority identifiers (optionally
associated with the metadata field) are currently completely unrelated to
epersons (which represent DSpace users).

Second, index-authority is a new, built-in implementation of an authority
index in DSpace 5 called SolrAuthority, that also happens to associate
ORCID IDs with the authority record.

What index-authority does is, as the official documentation describes [1],
look at all authors in your repository and for each unique author (which is
the string of the author's name if you don't already use a different
authority implementation) creates a record in the SolrAuthority index. It
is meant to be run as a one-off command after you first enable
SolrAuthority (should you run it again later, the records will be recreated
with different IDs, which is obviously something nobody wants). After that
initial run, new records are added using an event consumer.


[1]
https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSDOC5x/ORCID+Integration#ORCIDIntegration-Importingexistingauthors&keepingtheindexuptodate


Regards,
~~helix84

Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette
https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Dspace-general mailing list
Dspace-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-general

Reply via email to