Thanks Marianne for your suggestion. We have looked into the authorizations
approach and the only problem is that all of the reviewers are external to
us, so we don't have internet IDs to add to the group. Otherwise, there is
already a handy ability to expire the authorization on a certain date and
it is per file, so pretty nifty otherwise!

Your other suggestion of a neutral 3rd-party gives me pause because I'd
like us, the IR, to be best choice for our affiliates' data so that we
might compete with general purpose repositories like FigShare and Mendeley
data, which apparently can handle the blind review process. Our
institutional repository should be just as sophisticated as these third
party services - if not more since we have the burden of long-term
stewardship according to local research data ownership and retention policy
-- and the first choice for our researchers when depositing their data for
public access.

Lisa


On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Reed, Marianne A. <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you are using a version of DSpace that allows authorization policies
> for items, you could add the reviewer’s account to a Group that has access
> (or create a Group just for that reviewer) and grant Read access for the
> item to that group in the item’s Authorization policies.   After the peer
> review was over, you’d probably want to remove that access.
>
>
>
> I think that the solution to this may be easiest outside of DSpace.  If
> the journal is managing the peer review of the manuscript, could they also
> manage the peer review of the dataset?  Or, if the file was given to a
> neutral third party, the third party could give the dataset to the
> reviewer.
>
>
>
> -- Marianne
>
>
>
> Marianne Reed
>
> Digital Initiatives Coordinator
>
> 450 Watson Library
>
> University of Kansas Libraries
>
> [email protected]
>
> 785-864-8913
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:dspace-community@
> googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Lisa Johnston
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 03, 2016 4:28 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [dspace-community] Blind peer review in dspace
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Question for the group: Has anyone had/resolved the use case of blind peer
> reviewer access to items that are embargoed under request a copy?
>
>
>
> We have recently encountered this issue with our data repository (
> http://z.umn.edu/DRUM) which is open access, but allows for up to 2 year
> embargo on files (using request a copy). In a few instances a researcher
> asked if we could allow for blind peer review to a dataset because it is
> associated with a manuscript submitted for a journal. This idea of
> "confidential peer-review" is also a requirement for depositing data
> associated with data papers in Nature *Scientific Data. *(See *c*onditions
>  for* Institutional and project-specific
> repositories at http://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories
> <http://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories>) *
>
>
>
> Under normal (non-embargoed) circumstances, there is no problem for anyone
> (reviewer or not) to anonymously access the files. But, in the case of an
> unaccepted manuscript, the researcher is holding off on releasing the data
> openly until the paper is accepted for publication. Therefore, when they
> upload the dataset with request a copy enabled, they run the potential of
> breaking the "blindness" when the reviewer requests access to the dataset
> (since all requests go to the submitter).
>
>
>
> Any suggestions for a way around this - technical or otherwise? Note that
> double blind is not the need here, just single blind that keeps the
> reviewer anonymous.
>
>
>
> Also note: For DRUM, only institutional affiliates are allowed to register
> to our repository as epeople. The reviewers will almost always come from
> outside the institution.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your collective wisdom!
>
> Lisa
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Lisa Johnston
>
> Research Data Management/Curation Lead
>
> and Co-Director of the University Digital Conservancy
>
>
> University of Minnesota Libraries
>
> 108 Walter Library, Minneapolis, MN 55455
> Hangouts: [email protected] / Skype: ifylawwt
>
>
>
> http://lib.umn.edu/datamanagement  |   http://conservancy.umn.edu
>
> ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-9240
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "DSpace Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-community.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lisa Johnston
Research Data Management/Curation Lead
and Co-Director of the University Digital Conservancy

University of Minnesota Libraries
108 Walter Library, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Hangouts: [email protected] / Skype: ifylawwt

http://lib.umn.edu/datamanagement  |   http://conservancy.umn.edu

ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-9240

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DSpace Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-community.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to