On 24/07/20 10:06 am, Rohit K Bharadwaj wrote:
> changed usage of slave (deprecated) to secondary
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit K Bharadwaj <bharadwaj.roh...@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3: change patch subject, add version history
> v2: add changelog text in body of mail
> v1: fix style issues by changing usage of slave to secondary
> 
>  drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> index 360ec0407740..5d7b66719a39 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
>       return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -static void tegra_init_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
> +static void tegra_init_i2c_secondary(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>  {
>       u32 val;
>  
> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static void tegra_init_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> -static void nvec_disable_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
> +static void nvec_disable_i2c_secondary(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
>  {
>       disable_irq(nvec->irq);
>       writel(I2C_SL_NEWSL | I2C_SL_NACK, nvec->base + I2C_SL_CNFG);
> @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static int tegra_nvec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nvec);
>       nvec->dev = dev;
>  
> -     if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "slave-addr", &nvec->i2c_addr)) {
> +     if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "secondary-addr", 
> &nvec->i2c_addr)) {
>               dev_err(dev, "no i2c address specified");
>               return -ENODEV;
>       }
> @@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int tegra_nvec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       }
>       disable_irq(nvec->irq);
>  
> -     tegra_init_i2c_slave(nvec);
> +     tegra_init_i2c_secondary(nvec);
>  
>       /* enable event reporting */
>       nvec_toggle_global_events(nvec, true);
> @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int nvec_suspend(struct device *dev)
>       if (!err)
>               nvec_msg_free(nvec, msg);
>  
> -     nvec_disable_i2c_slave(nvec);
> +     nvec_disable_i2c_secondary(nvec);
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static int nvec_resume(struct device *dev)
>       struct nvec_chip *nvec = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  
>       dev_dbg(nvec->dev, "resuming\n");
> -     tegra_init_i2c_slave(nvec);
> +     tegra_init_i2c_secondary(nvec);
>       nvec_toggle_global_events(nvec, true);
>  
>       return 0;
> 
Dear All, this message was not delivered to marvi...@gmx.de, I'm getting that 
The response from the remote server was:
554 gmx.net (mxgmx016) Nemesis ESMTP Service not available No SMTP service 
Reject due to policy restrictions, 

I'm really sorry if I'm wasting your time by these trivial problems, thanks a 
lot for your time, could you please let me know whether I have to resend the 
patch again or is the patch fine currently and can be accepted into the linux 
kernel tree?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to