On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 17:02 +0100, John Oldman wrote:
> Fix coding style issue
>
> Signed-off-by: John Oldman <john.old...@polehill.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c
> index be0053c795b7..ca836ca2ee81 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx.c
> @@ -419,10 +419,8 @@ static int rtsx_control_thread(void *__dev)
> chip->srb->device->id,
> (u8)chip->srb->device->lun);
> chip->srb->result = DID_BAD_TARGET << 16;
> - }
> -
> - /* we've got a command, let's do it! */
> - else {
> + } else {
> + /* we've got a command, let's do it! */
> scsi_show_command(chip);
> rtsx_invoke_transport(chip->srb, chip);
> }
Please look at the code blocks you are changing and
if you are trying to fix unbalanced else blocks, do
all the blocks, not just one of many consecutive.
/* reject the command if the direction indicator
* is UNKNOWN
*/
if (chip->srb->sc_data_direction == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL) {
dev_err(&dev->pci->dev, "UNKNOWN data direction\n");
chip->srb->result = DID_ERROR << 16;
}
/* reject if target != 0 or if LUN is higher than
* the maximum known LUN
*/
else if (chip->srb->device->id) {
dev_err(&dev->pci->dev, "Bad target number (%d:%d)\n",
chip->srb->device->id,
(u8)chip->srb->device->lun);
chip->srb->result = DID_BAD_TARGET << 16;
}
else if (chip->srb->device->lun > chip->max_lun) {
dev_err(&dev->pci->dev, "Bad LUN (%d:%d)\n",
chip->srb->device->id,
(u8)chip->srb->device->lun);
chip->srb->result = DID_BAD_TARGET << 16;
}
/* we've got a command, let's do it! */
else {
scsi_show_command(chip);
rtsx_invoke_transport(chip->srb, chip);
}
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
