On 03/27/20 17:58:02, Oscar Carter wrote:
> Define the EnCFG_BBType_MASK bit as an OR operation between two previous
> defines instead of using the OR between two new BIT macros. Thus, the
> code is more clear.
> 
> Fixes: a74081b44291 ("staging: vt6656: Use BIT() macro instead of hex value")
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Carter <oscar.car...@gmx.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h b/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h
> index c532b27de37f..b01d9ee8677e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
>  #define EnCFG_BBType_a               0x00
>  #define EnCFG_BBType_b               BIT(0)
>  #define EnCFG_BBType_g               BIT(1)
> -#define EnCFG_BBType_MASK    (BIT(0) | BIT(1))
> +#define EnCFG_BBType_MASK    (EnCFG_BBType_b | EnCFG_BBType_g)
>  #define EnCFG_ProtectMd              BIT(5)
> 
>  /* Bits in the EnhanceCFG_1 register */
> --
> 2.20.1
> 

Reviewed-by: Quentin Deslandes <quentin.deslan...@itdev.co.uk>

Thanks,
Quentin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to