Hi Christoph,

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:10:21AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >  {
> > -   struct erofs_vnode *vi = ptr;
> > -
> > -   inode_init_once(&vi->vfs_inode);
> > +   inode_init_once(&((struct erofs_inode *)ptr)->vfs_inode);
> 
> Why doesn't this use EROFS_I?  This looks a little odd.

Thanks for your reply and suggestion...
EROFS_I seems the revert direction ---> inode to erofs_inode
here we need "erofs_inode" to inode...

Am I missing something?.... Hope not....

Thanks,
Gao Xiang



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to