Hi Dan, thanks for reviewing.

On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 18:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 04:40:29PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > @@ -1740,7 +1740,8 @@ parse_rx_slots(struct vchiq_state *state)
> >                                     &service->bulk_rx : &service->bulk_tx;
> >  
> >                             DEBUG_TRACE(PARSE_LINE);
> > -                           if (mutex_lock_killable(&service->bulk_mutex)) {
> > +                           if (mutex_lock_killable(
> > +                                   &service->bulk_mutex) != 0) {
> 
> This series does't add != 0 consistently...  Personally, I would prefer
> we just leave it out.  I use != 0 for two things.  1)  When I'm talking
> about the number zero.
> 
>       if (len == 0) {
> 
> Or with strcmp():
> 
>       if (strcmp(a, b) == 0) { // a equals b
>       if (strcmp(a, b) < 0) {  // a less than b.
> 
> But here zero means no errors, so I would just leave it out...

I agree, I'll fix it.

Regards,
Nicolas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to