On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 05:27:25AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > wait_for_completion_timeout() returns unsigned long (0 on timeout or > remaining jiffies) not int. >
Yeah, but it's fine though because 10000 / 256 fits into int without a problem. I'm not sure this sort of patch is worth it when it's just a style debate instead of a bugfix. I'm a little bit torn about this. In Smatch, I run into this issue one in a while where Smatch doesn't know if the timeout is less than int. Right now I hacked the DB to say that these functions always return < INT_MAX. Anyway, for sure the commit message should say that it's just a cleanup and not a bugfix. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
