On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 07:51:03PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > Let's use xattr_prefix instead of open code. > No logic changes. > > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxian...@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c b/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c > index 1c9498e38f0e..eca65df46133 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c > @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static int xattr_entrylist(struct xattr_iter *_it, > return 1; > > /* Note that at least one of 'prefix' and 'name' should be non-NULL */
The comment is sort of confusing now. > - prefix = h->prefix != NULL ? h->prefix : h->name; > + prefix = xattr_prefix(h); > prefix_len = strlen(prefix); regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
