On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:44:43PM +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
> On 9/5/18 10:13 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 01:16:15PM +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
> > > 
> > >           case LED_CTL_SITE_SURVEY:
> > > -         if ((pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.bBusyTraffic) && 
> > > (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_LINKED))) {
> > > -                 ;
> > > -         } else if (!pLed->bLedScanBlinkInProgress) {
> > > +         if (!pLed->bLedScanBlinkInProgress) {
> > 
> > I think you have introduced a bug...
> 
> Ah yes I see now, thanks.
> Would it be ok to merge the conditions in a single if?
> 
> if ((!pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.bBusyTraffic ||
>     !check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_LINKED)) &&
      ^
Put an extra space here because it's inside the inner parens.

>     !pLed->bLedScanBlinkInProgress) {

So it would be aligned like so:

        if ((!pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.bBusyTraffic ||
             !check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_LINKED)) &&
            !pLed->bLedScanBlinkInProgress) {

regards,
dan capenter


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to