On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 09:29:25PM -0300, Leonardo Brás wrote:
> Fixing some styles as recommended by checkpatch.pl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Brás <leobra...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c | 10 ++++++----
> drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
> b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
> index 8ce1ff9b6c2a..20d94712cc84 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
> @@ -60,11 +60,13 @@ void func(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...)
> \
> out: \
> va_end(args); \
> }
> \
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(func);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(func)
why did you change this line?
>
> -define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg8_bus8, u8, u8, )
> -define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus8, __be16, u16, cpu_to_be16)
> -define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus16, u16, u16, )
> +#define no_modf /*No modifier*/
Ick ick ick, no.
> +
> +define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg8_bus8, u8, u8, no_modf);
> +define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus8, __be16, u16, cpu_to_be16);
> +define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus16, u16, u16, no_modf);
>
> void fbtft_write_reg8_bus9(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> index 64f69d1a3029..8b79353c722a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ void fbtft_unregister_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par)
> par->info->bl_dev = NULL;
> }
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_unregister_backlight);
You are doing a lot of different things all in one patch, please break
this up into one patch per logical thing.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
