On Wed, Apr 18 2018, Christian Lütke-Stetzkamp wrote:
> The msdc_init_gpd_bd function is currently hard to read, because of
> old, commented out code and a while loop, where a for loop is much
> easier to read. Refactor it to make the code more readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Lütke-Stetzkamp <christ...@lkamp.de>
> ---
> drivers/staging/mt7621-mmc/sd.c | 27 ++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/mt7621-mmc/sd.c b/drivers/staging/mt7621-mmc/sd.c
> index 580ac87d9a5f..0da998c74713 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/mt7621-mmc/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/mt7621-mmc/sd.c
> @@ -2501,32 +2501,21 @@ static void msdc_init_gpd_bd(struct msdc_host *host,
> struct msdc_dma *dma)
> {
> struct gpd *gpd = dma->gpd;
> struct bd *bd = dma->bd;
> - struct bd *ptr, *prev;
> + int i;
>
> - /* we just support one gpd */
> - int bdlen = MAX_BD_PER_GPD;
> + /* we just support one gpd, but gpd->next must be set for desc
> + * DMA. That's why we alloc 2 gpd structurs.
> + */
>
> - /* init the 2 gpd */
> memset(gpd, 0, sizeof(struct gpd) * 2);
> - //gpd->next = (void *)virt_to_phys(gpd + 1); /* pointer to a null gpd,
> bug! kmalloc <-> virt_to_phys */
> - //gpd->next = (dma->gpd_addr + 1); /* bug */
> - gpd->next = (void *)((u32)dma->gpd_addr + sizeof(struct gpd));
>
> - //gpd->intr = 0;
> gpd->bdp = 1; /* hwo, cs, bd pointer */
> - //gpd->ptr = (void*)virt_to_phys(bd);
> gpd->ptr = (void *)dma->bd_addr; /* physical address */
> + gpd->next = (void *)((u32)dma->gpd_addr + sizeof(struct gpd));
>
> - memset(bd, 0, sizeof(struct bd) * bdlen);
> - ptr = bd + bdlen - 1;
> - //ptr->eol = 1; /* 0 or 1 [Fix me]*/
> - //ptr->next = 0;
> -
> - while (ptr != bd) {
> - prev = ptr - 1;
> - prev->next = (void *)(dma->bd_addr + sizeof(struct bd) * (ptr -
> bd));
> - ptr = prev;
> - }
> + memset(bd, 0, sizeof(struct bd) * MAX_BD_NUM);
> + for (i = 0; i < (MAX_BD_NUM - 1); i++)
> + bd[i].next = (void *)(dma->bd_addr * sizeof(*bd) * (i + 1));Sorry, I hadn't actually tested this when I gave my reviewed-by. I have now and it didn't work. Look at the last line above. Look carefully. Thanks, NeilBrown > } > > static int msdc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > -- > 2.16.1
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
