On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 11:44:04AM +0900, Ji-Hun Kim wrote:
> @@ -528,18 +528,22 @@ static void device_free_rings(struct vnt_private *priv)
>                                 priv->tx0_bufs, priv->tx_bufs_dma0);
>  }
>  
> -static void device_init_rd0_ring(struct vnt_private *priv)
> +static int device_init_rd0_ring(struct vnt_private *priv)
>  {
>       int i;
>       dma_addr_t      curr = priv->rd0_pool_dma;
>       struct vnt_rx_desc *desc;
> +     int ret = 0;

Don't initialize "ret".  When you do that it disables static analysis to
find uninitialized variable warnings.

>  
>       /* Init the RD0 ring entries */
>       for (i = 0; i < priv->opts.rx_descs0;
>            i ++, curr += sizeof(struct vnt_rx_desc)) {
>               desc = &priv->aRD0Ring[i];
>               desc->rd_info = kzalloc(sizeof(*desc->rd_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> +             if (!desc->rd_info) {
> +                     ret = -ENOMEM;
> +                     goto error;
> +             }
>               if (!device_alloc_rx_buf(priv, desc))
>                       dev_err(&priv->pcid->dev, "can not alloc rx bufs\n");
>  

We need to handle the case where device_alloc_rx_buf() fails as well...

Some years back, I wrote a post about error handling that might be
helpful:
https://plus.google.com/106378716002406849458/posts/dnanfhQ4mHQ

You are using "one err" and "do nothing" style error handling which are
described in the post.


> @@ -550,20 +554,29 @@ static void device_init_rd0_ring(struct vnt_private 
> *priv)
>       if (i > 0)
>               priv->aRD0Ring[i-1].next_desc = cpu_to_le32(priv->rd0_pool_dma);
>       priv->pCurrRD[0] = &priv->aRD0Ring[0];
> +
> +     return 0;
> +error:
> +     device_free_rd0_ring(priv);
> +     return ret;
>  }

Of course, Jia-Ju Bai is correct to say that this is a layering
violation.  Each function should only clean up after its self.

Also, this is a very typical "one err" style bug which I explain about
in my g+ post.  The rule that applies here is that you should only free
things which have been allocated.  Since we only partially allocated the
rd0 ring, device_free_rd0_ring() will crash when we do:

                dma_unmap_single(&priv->pcid->dev, rd_info->skb_dma,
                                 priv->rx_buf_sz, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);

"rd_info" is NULL so rd_info->skb_dma is a NULL dereference.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to