Comment was outdated and did not reflect what was actually happening.
Update the comment to reflect reality.

Signed-off-by: David Kershner <david.kersh...@unisys.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Sell <timothy.s...@unisys.com>
---
 drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 15 ++++-----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c 
b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
index 34b3170..5cbc69f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
@@ -1237,18 +1237,11 @@ parahotplug_process_message(struct controlvm_message 
*inmsg)
        if (!req)
                return -ENOMEM;
 
+       /*
+        * For enable messages, just respond with success right away, we don't
+        * need to wait to see if the enable was successful.
+        */
        if (inmsg->cmd.device_change_state.state.active) {
-               /*
-                * For enable messages, just respond with success
-                * right away. This is a bit of a hack, but there are
-                * issues with the early enable messages we get (with
-                * either the udev script not detecting that the device
-                * is up, or not getting called at all). Fortunately
-                * the messages that get lost don't matter anyway, as
-                *
-                * devices are automatically enabled at
-                * initialization.
-                */
                err = parahotplug_request_kickoff(req);
                if (err)
                        goto err_respond;
-- 
git-series 0.9.1
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to