Hi,
On 13-04-17 17:46, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
The two different paths for an if statement are identical and hence
we can just replace it with the single statement.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1428443 ("Identical code for
different branches")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
Patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
Regards,
Hans
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
index 53755e5b97a6..9e355734f0c0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
@@ -1093,11 +1093,7 @@ void rtw_free_assoc_resources(struct adapter *adapter,
int lock_scanned_queue)
rtw_init_bcmc_stainfo(adapter);
}
- if (lock_scanned_queue) {
- find_network(adapter);
- } else {
- find_network(adapter);
- }
+ find_network(adapter);
if (lock_scanned_queue)
adapter->securitypriv.key_mask = 0;
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
