> -----Original Message----- > From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuzn...@redhat.com]
> > We may be supporting more than 64 CPUs in this hypercall. I am going > > to inquire with the Windows folks and get back to you. > > Thanks! It is even specified in the specification: > "Future versions of the hypervisor may support more than 64 virtual > processors per partition. In that case, a new field will be added to the flags > value that allows the caller to define the “processor bank” to which the > processor mask applies." > > We, however, need to know where to put this in flags. Would the HvFlushVirtualAddressListEx hypercall do? Is there a doc update/clarification needed? Regards, Jork _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
