On Apr 3, 2017, at 15:13, Craig Inches <cr...@craiginches.com> wrote:
>
> This resolves a checkpatch warning that "Single statement macros should
> not use a do {} while (0) loop" by removing the loop and adjusting line
> length accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <cr...@craiginches.com>
> ---
> .../lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h | 51 +++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> index 2dae857..150454f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> @@ -87,12 +87,9 @@ do {
> \
> #define LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE (2 << PAGE_SHIFT) /* 2 pages */
> #endif
>
> -#define LIBCFS_ALLOC_PRE(size, mask) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERT(!in_interrupt() || \
> - ((size) <= LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE && \
> - !gfpflags_allow_blocking(mask))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LIBCFS_ALLOC_PRE(size, mask) \
> + LASSERT(!in_interrupt() || ((size) <= LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE \
> + && !gfpflags_allow_blocking(mask)))
(style) keep operators at the end of the previous line, rather than the start
of the continued line
>
> #define LIBCFS_ALLOC_POST(ptr, size) \
> do { \
> @@ -187,46 +184,28 @@ void cfs_array_free(void *vars);
> #if LASSERT_ATOMIC_ENABLED
>
> /** assert value of @a is equal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_EQ(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) == v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_EQ(a, v) LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) == v,
> \
> + "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
Minor nit - in cases like this where you need to split the line anyway, it
is cleaner (IMHO) to keep the whole statement together:
#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_EQ(a, v) \
LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) == v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
Cheers, Andreas
>
> /** assert value of @a is unequal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_NE(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) != v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_NE(a, v) LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) != v,
> \
> + "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is little than @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LT(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) < v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LT(a, v) LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) < v, \
> + "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is little/equal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LE(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) <= v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LE(a, v) LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) <= v,
> \
> + "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is great than @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) > v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT(a, v) LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) > v, \
> + "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is great/equal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) >= v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE(a, v) LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) >= v,
> \
> + "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is great than @v1 and little than @v2 */
> #define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT_LT(a, v1, v2) \
> --
> 2.10.2
>
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
