On Sun, 19 Mar 2017, simran singhal wrote:
> Remove unnecessary goto.
>
> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimr...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> index 297665d..c9ed2ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> @@ -663,12 +663,12 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
> ad5933_cmd(st, AD5933_CTRL_START_SWEEP);
> st->state = AD5933_CTRL_START_SWEEP;
> schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
> - goto out;
> + mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
This is not correct. The code at the end of the function implicitly does
a return, which has disappeared in the change. You could add a return to
each place wher you have put a mutex_unlock, but I think that the code was
better off as it was. It's microscopically less error prone to have this
cleanup code in only one place.
julia
> }
>
> ret = ad5933_i2c_read(st->client, AD5933_REG_STATUS, 1, &status);
> if (ret)
> - goto out;
> + mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>
> if (status & AD5933_STAT_DATA_VALID) {
> int scan_count = bitmap_weight(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
> AD5933_REG_REAL_DATA : AD5933_REG_IMAG_DATA,
> scan_count * 2, (u8 *)buf);
> if (ret)
> - goto out;
> + mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>
> if (scan_count == 2) {
> val[0] = be16_to_cpu(buf[0]);
> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
> } else {
> /* no data available - try again later */
> schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
> - goto out;
> + mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> }
>
> if (status & AD5933_STAT_SWEEP_DONE) {
> @@ -703,8 +703,6 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
> ad5933_cmd(st, AD5933_CTRL_INC_FREQ);
> schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
> }
> -out:
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> }
>
> static int ad5933_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "outreachy-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-ker...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/20170319175133.GA19710%40singhal-Inspiron-5558.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
