On 03/12/2017 02:10 PM, simran singhal wrote:
> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
> ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* modes.
> 
> In this driver, mlock was being used to protect hardware state
> changes.  Replace it with a lock in the devices global data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimr...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c 
> b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
> index c9d46e7..90a3a18 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
> @@ -29,11 +29,13 @@
>   * @us_r:            actual spi_device to read back data
>   * @buf:             transmit or receive buffer
>   * @buf_lock:                mutex to protect tx and rx
> + * @lock:            protect sensor state
>   **/
>  struct adis16060_state {
>       struct spi_device               *us_w;
>       struct spi_device               *us_r;
>       struct mutex                    buf_lock;
> +     struct mutex                    lock;    /* protect sensor state */

There should be no need to have two locks here. One should be enough. The
buf_lock protects both the adis16060_spi_write() and adis16060_spi_read()
functions. But both are always called in a pair. First write, then read. You
can refactor the code to have one single function
adis16060_spi_write_than_read() which is protected by the existing buf_lock.


>  
>       u8 buf[3] ____cacheline_aligned;
>  };
> @@ -87,7 +89,7 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>       switch (mask) {
>       case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
>               /* Take the iio_dev status lock */
> -             mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> +             mutex_lock(&st->lock);
>               ret = adis16060_spi_write(indio_dev, chan->address);
>               if (ret < 0)
>                       goto out_unlock;
> @@ -96,7 +98,7 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>               if (ret < 0)
>                       goto out_unlock;
>  
> -             mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> +             mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
>               *val = tval;
>               return IIO_VAL_INT;
>       case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
> @@ -112,7 +114,7 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>       return -EINVAL;
>  
>  out_unlock:
> -     mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> +     mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> 

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to