On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:59:36AM +0900, Chetan Sethi wrote:
> This patch fixes warning of line over 80 characters, as issued by
> checkpatch.pl
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chetan Sethi <cpsethi...@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - split multiple changes across different patches
> v3:
>  - mentioned patch revision in subject
> v4:
>  - modified description to exclude mention of patch number from changelog
> v5:
>  - updated series for removing additional checkpatch error introduced
> 
>  drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h 
> b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h
> index 9ab80e1..668202d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h
> @@ -18,10 +18,10 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  
> -#include <linux/spinlock.h>  /* spinlock_t                                   
> */
> -#include <linux/sched.h>     /* wait_queue_head_t                            
> */
> -#include <linux/types.h>     /* pid_t                                        
> */
> -#include <linux/netdevice.h> /* struct net_device_stats,  struct sk_buff     
> */
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>  /* spinlock_t */
> +#include <linux/sched.h>     /* wait_queue_head_t */
> +#include <linux/types.h>     /* pid_t */
> +#include <linux/netdevice.h> /* struct net_device_stats,  struct sk_buff */
>  #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
>  #include <linux/wireless.h>
>  #include <linux/atomic.h>    /* struct atomic_t */
> @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@
>  
>  #ifdef KS_WLAN_DEBUG
>  #define DPRINTK(n, fmt, args...) \
> -                 if (KS_WLAN_DEBUG > (n)) printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: "fmt, 
> __FUNCTION__, ## args)
> +                 if (KS_WLAN_DEBUG > (n)) \

Why did you not use a tab here to indent this line as you were modifying
it?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to