Yes, I totally agree with joe.

But as there is no coding style issue in this patch.
So, do I have to resend the complete patch series again?


On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 01:44 +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_wx.c 
>> b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_wx.c
> []
>> @@ -150,14 +150,15 @@ static inline char *rtl819x_translate_scan(struct 
>> ieee80211_device *ieee,
>>               PHT_CAPABILITY_ELE ht_cap = NULL;
>>               bool is40M = false, isShortGI = false;
>>               u8 max_mcs = 0;
>> +
>>               if (!memcmp(network->bssht.bdHTCapBuf, EWC11NHTCap, 4))
>>                       ht_cap = 
>> (PHT_CAPABILITY_ELE)&network->bssht.bdHTCapBuf[4];
>>               else
>>                       ht_cap = 
>> (PHT_CAPABILITY_ELE)&network->bssht.bdHTCapBuf[0];
>> -             is40M = (ht_cap->ChlWidth)?1:0;
>> -             isShortGI = (ht_cap->ChlWidth)?
>> -                                             ((ht_cap->ShortGI40Mhz)?1:0):
>> -                                             ((ht_cap->ShortGI20Mhz)?1:0);
>> +             is40M = (ht_cap->ChlWidth) ? 1 : 0;
>> +             isShortGI = (ht_cap->ChlWidth) ?
>> +                                             ((ht_cap->ShortGI40Mhz) ? 1 : 
>> 0) :
>> +                                             ((ht_cap->ShortGI20Mhz) ? 1 : 
>> 0);
>
> You have a brain, checkpatch is brainless.
> Please remember to do more than just shut-up checkpatch.
>
> This could be simplified by removing parentheses and ternaries to
>
>                 isShortGI = ht_cap->Ch1Width ? ht_cap->ShortGI40Mhz
>                                              : ht_cap->ShortGI20Mhz;
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to