> From: Niu Yawei <yawei....@intel.com>
> 
> Otherwise, those leftovers would interfere with new timestamps
> especially when the timestamps are set back in time on the other
> clients.

Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimm...@infradead.org>
 
> Signed-off-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xi...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Niu Yawei <yawei....@intel.com>
> Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/22623
> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-8446
> Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam <bobi...@hotmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <gr...@linuxhacker.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c 
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
> index 74d9b73..c268f32 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
> @@ -251,6 +251,16 @@ int ll_md_blocking_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct 
> ldlm_lock_desc *desc,
>                                      PFID(ll_inode2fid(inode)), rc);
>               }
>  
> +             if (bits & MDS_INODELOCK_UPDATE) {
> +                     struct ll_inode_info *lli = ll_i2info(inode);
> +
> +                     spin_lock(&lli->lli_lock);
> +                     LTIME_S(inode->i_mtime) = 0;
> +                     LTIME_S(inode->i_atime) = 0;
> +                     LTIME_S(inode->i_ctime) = 0;
> +                     spin_unlock(&lli->lli_lock);
> +             }
> +
>               if ((bits & MDS_INODELOCK_UPDATE) && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
>                       struct ll_inode_info *lli = ll_i2info(inode);
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to