A patch to change to page accounting code (in v4.8-rc1) conflicts with
a change to lustre (in staging-next for v4.9), and fortunately gets
detected using a gcc warning:

In file included from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/mm.h:1001:0,
                 from /git/arm-soc/include/linux/highmem.h:7,
                 from 
/git/arm-soc/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/../../include/linux/libcfs/linux/libcfs.h:46,
                 from 
/git/arm-soc/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/../../include/linux/libcfs/libcfs.h:36,
                 from 
/git/arm-soc/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_cl_internal.h:45,
                 from 
/git/arm-soc/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c:40:
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c: In function 
'unstable_page_accounting':
include/linux/vmstat.h:117:2: error: array subscript is above array bounds 
[-Werror=array-bounds]
  atomic_long_add(x, &vm_zone_stat[item]);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:117:2: error: array subscript is above array bounds 
[-Werror=array-bounds]
  atomic_long_add(x, &vm_zone_stat[item]);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This changes the function to use the correct interface for accounting in the
"node" rather than the "zone".

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Fixes: d806f30e639b ("staging: lustre: osc: revise unstable pages accounting")
Fixes: 11fb998986a7 ("mm: move most file-based accounting to the node")
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c 
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c
index 583a0af2d388..c8889eabc402 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ out:
 
 /**
  * Atomic operations are expensive. We accumulate the accounting for the
- * same page zone to get better performance.
+ * same page pgdat to get better performance.
  * In practice this can work pretty good because the pages in the same RPC
  * are likely from the same page zone.
  */
@@ -797,28 +797,28 @@ static inline void unstable_page_accounting(struct 
ptlrpc_bulk_desc *desc,
                                            int factor)
 {
        int page_count = desc->bd_iov_count;
-       void *zone = NULL;
+       pg_data_t *last = NULL;
        int count = 0;
        int i;
 
        for (i = 0; i < page_count; i++) {
-               void *pz = page_zone(desc->bd_iov[i].bv_page);
+               pg_data_t *pgdat = page_pgdat(desc->bd_iov[i].bv_page);
 
-               if (likely(pz == zone)) {
+               if (likely(pgdat == last)) {
                        ++count;
                        continue;
                }
 
                if (count > 0) {
-                       mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNSTABLE_NFS,
+                       mod_node_page_state(pgdat, NR_UNSTABLE_NFS,
                                            factor * count);
                        count = 0;
                }
-               zone = pz;
+               last = pgdat;
                ++count;
        }
        if (count > 0)
-               mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNSTABLE_NFS, factor * count);
+               mod_node_page_state(last, NR_UNSTABLE_NFS, factor * count);
 }
 
 static inline void add_unstable_page_accounting(struct ptlrpc_bulk_desc *desc)
-- 
2.9.0

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to