On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:00:41PM +0530, Rithvik Patibandla wrote:
> The following patch fixes format of some comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rithvik Patibandla <rithvik...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c | 71 
> +++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c 
> b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
> index f80ee77..8cb5cb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
> @@ -70,11 +70,11 @@ static void setChipClock(unsigned int frequency)
>               pll.inputFreq = DEFAULT_INPUT_CLOCK; /* Defined in CLOCK.H */
>               pll.clockType = MXCLK_PLL;
>  
> -             /*
> -             * Call calcPllValue() to fill up the other fields for PLL 
> structure.
> -             * Sometime, the chip cannot set up the exact clock required by 
> User.
> -             * Return value from calcPllValue() gives the actual possible 
> clock.
> -             */
> +     /*
> +      * Call calcPllValue() to fill up the other fields for PLL structure.
> +      * Sometime, the chip cannot set up the exact clock required by User.
> +      * Return value from calcPllValue() gives the actual possible clock.
> +      */

Really?  Does that look correct to you?

hint your indentation is totally wrong :(

Please be more careful...

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to