I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com> --- drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c b/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c index f45b2ef..888016c 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c +++ b/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.c @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ /* Module definitions */ static ushort resumeline = 898; -module_param(resumeline, ushort, 0444); +module_param(resumeline, ushort, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); static struct dcon_platform_data *pdata; -- 2.9.2 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
