On Jun 23, 2016, at 2:56 PM, Lidza Louina wrote:

> The code attempted to add an unsigned int to a an unsigned 64-bit
> integer. This patch makes the code use the correct type of int to
> suppress a smatch warning.

I think you might want to update the commit message too, because
it does not really make much sense now.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Lidza Louina <lidza.lou...@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c 
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c
> index 346db89..fc5b763 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c
> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ lnet_res_lh_initialize(struct lnet_res_container *rec, 
> lnet_libhandle_t *lh)
>       unsigned int hash;
> 
>       lh->lh_cookie = rec->rec_lh_cookie;
> -     rec->rec_lh_cookie += 1 << ibits;
> +     rec->rec_lh_cookie += (1ULL << ibits);
> 
>       hash = (lh->lh_cookie >> ibits) & LNET_LH_HASH_MASK;
> 
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-devel mailing list
> lustre-de...@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to