On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:23:37AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 01:53:03AM +0100, Salah Triki wrote: > > The call of eprom_read may fail, therefore its return value must be > > checked > > > > Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.tr...@acm.org> > > --- > > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c | 145 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c > > b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c > > index 849a95e..6bcbdae 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c > > @@ -2440,9 +2440,13 @@ static void rtl8192_read_eeprom_info(struct > > net_device *dev) > > struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev); > > u16 tmpValue = 0; > > int i; > > + int ret; > > > > RT_TRACE(COMP_EPROM, "===========>%s()\n", __func__); > > - wEPROM_ID = eprom_read(dev, 0); /* first read EEPROM ID out; */ > > + ret = eprom_read(dev, 0); /* first read EEPROM ID out; */ > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return; > > + wEPROM_ID = (u16)ret; > > > Think about this code. It's completely broken now. > > I'm still not going to review this patchset.
Oops.. Actually you changed this from the previous version so it should work now. My bad. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
