On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Panos Vlachos wrote: > Fixed one coding style issue in the > file router_proc.c (Lustre staging driver)
Perhaps it's best to reference what the issue is. I.e. "Fix too long line in …" and then in the actual message add that you just split it? > > Signed-off-by: Panos Vlachos <panosvl...@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c > b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c > index 65f65a3..87afb40 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router_proc.c > @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ > */ > #define LNET_PROC_CPT_BITS (LNET_CPT_BITS + 1) > /* change version, 16 bits or 8 bits */ > -#define LNET_PROC_VER_BITS max_t(size_t, min_t(size_t, LNET_LOFFT_BITS, > 64) / 4, 8) > +#define LNET_PROC_VER_BITS \ > +max_t(size_t, min_t(size_t, LNET_LOFFT_BITS, 64) / 4, 8) Hm, I am not sure this is an improvement, you might want to at least place a tab at the start of this second line, so that indentation helps us better see it's a continuation of the previous one. Thanks. > > #define LNET_PROC_HASH_BITS LNET_PEER_HASH_BITS > /* > -- > 1.9.1 > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
