On Fri, Oct 09, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > yes, but after doing fcopy_respond_to_host(). I'd suggest we leave the > > > check in place, better safe than sorry. > > > > Agreed; Olaf, if it is ok with you, I can fix it up and send. > > I will retest with this part reverted. I think without two code paths > entering hv_fcopy_callback it should be ok to leave this check in.
Today I restored the "fcopy_transaction.state != HVUTIL_USERSPACE_REQ" check and its working fine. Olaf _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
