On Fri, Oct 09, Olaf Hering wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 08, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> 
> > > yes, but after doing fcopy_respond_to_host(). I'd suggest we leave the
> > > check in place, better safe than sorry.
> > 
> > Agreed; Olaf, if it is ok with you, I can fix it up and send.
> 
> I will retest with this part reverted. I think without two code paths
> entering hv_fcopy_callback it should be ok to leave this check in.

Today I restored the "fcopy_transaction.state != HVUTIL_USERSPACE_REQ"
check and its working fine.

Olaf
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to