On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 06:47:35PM +0530, Chandra S Gorentla wrote:
> During the clean-up of the function, it is need to check if
> errors occurred, not the memory pointer.
>
The bug here is that we have a use after free on the success path. It
should have been mentioned in the changelog.
Anyway, this patch is buggy. If result == -EFAULT then it will crash.
Also this patch is really ugly. There is someone who is going to send a
correct fix (just add a return 0).
This driver usese "do everything" style error handling. It is a bug
prone anti-pattern because doing everything is more complicated than
doing one thing. You can easily see it is bug prone, because it made
you introduce a bug, right?
Instead the error handling should look like this:
return 0;
err_free_msg:
kfree(pstrMessage);
return ret;
There are no error paths where we need to free "pstrMessage->pvBuffer"
but if we were to add one it would look like this:
return 0;
err_pvbuffer:
kfree(pstrMessage->pvBuffer);
err_msg:
kfree(pstrMessage);
return ret;
This is a minimal, uncomplicated, no indenting, no if statement way of
unwinding.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
