Properly handle the return value from queue_delayed_work() - it's a
bool, not an int, so using a less than comparison isn't appropriate.
This mistake was found by David Binderman <dcb...@hotmail.com>.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.ro...@unisys.com>
---
drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/periodic_work.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/periodic_work.c
b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/periodic_work.c
index a3631c3..115b7aa 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/periodic_work.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/periodic_work.c
@@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ bool visor_periodic_work_nextperiod(struct periodic_work *pw)
pw->want_to_stop = false;
rc = true; /* yes, true; see visor_periodic_work_stop() */
goto unlock;
- } else if (queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
- pw->jiffy_interval) < 0) {
+ } else if (!queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
+ pw->jiffy_interval)) {
pw->is_scheduled = false;
rc = false;
goto unlock;
@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ bool visor_periodic_work_start(struct periodic_work *pw)
goto unlock;
}
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&pw->work, &periodic_work_func);
- if (queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
- pw->jiffy_interval) < 0) {
+ if (!queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
+ pw->jiffy_interval)) {
rc = false;
goto unlock;
}
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
