On Thursday 24 September 2015 10:40:09 Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:13:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > This time is only printed in procfs, and can be easily converted
> > to 64-bit to avoid overflowing on 32-bit systems in 2038.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> > ---
> This introduces new build warnings:
> 
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c: In function 
> ‘lprocfs_rd_timeouts’:
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c:894:10: warning: 
> format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type 
> ‘time64_t’ [-Wformat=]
>           "network", cur, worst, worstt, DHMS_VARS(&ts));
>           ^
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c:906:11: warning: 
> format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 6 has type 
> ‘time64_t’ [-Wformat=]
>            cur, worst, worstt, DHMS_VARS(&ts));
>            ^

Sorry about that. I checked all the patches for new warnings but then only did
a partial check after rebasing to staging-testing. I'll fix it up and run the
full tests again.

        Arnd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to