On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:29:26AM +0900, Tony Cho wrote: > > > On 2015년 09월 12일 11:35, Greg KH wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:04:19PM +0900, Tony Cho wrote: > >>From: Glen Lee <glen....@atmel.com> > >> > >>This patch removes a unused enum tenuFrameClass. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Glen Lee <glen....@atmel.com> > >>Signed-off-by: Tony Cho <tony....@atmel.com> > >>--- > >> drivers/staging/wilc1000/coreconfigurator.c | 8 -------- > >> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) > >I already applied this, why resend it? > > > >greg k-h > > This is one of series for the "[PATCH v2 2/2] staging: wilc1000: > coreconfigurator.c: remove unused function". > That's why it was sent to you.
But you sent it as a part of a different series, why do that? When you do a v2 patch, please be specific, resend the whole series. Otherwise how am I supposed to know what to do? Remember, I get hundreds of patches to review and handle every day, you need to be very obvious as to what I need to do otherwise I will get it wrong :) greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
