I resent it since no one responded to it for 10 days. From what I came to understand that is the common practice. If that is not the case I'm sorry (and please let me know so I don't do it again).
Cheers, Anders Fridlund On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 01:53:49PM +0200, Anders Fridlund wrote: >> Fix sparse warning 'Using plain integer as NULL pointer' by replacing 0 >> with NULL in the assignment. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anders Fridlund <anders.fridl...@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/staging/most/aim-network/networking.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/aim-network/networking.c >> b/drivers/staging/most/aim-network/networking.c >> index c8ab239..a1e1bce 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/most/aim-network/networking.c >> +++ b/drivers/staging/most/aim-network/networking.c >> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void most_net_rm_netdev_safe(struct >> net_dev_context *nd) >> >> unregister_netdev(nd->dev); >> free_netdev(nd->dev); >> - nd->dev = 0; >> + nd->dev = NULL; >> } >> >> static struct net_dev_context *get_net_dev_context( >> -- >> 1.9.1 > > Why did you resend this patch again? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
