Hello Dan.
On 2015년 08월 13일 23:49, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 01:41:23PM +0900, Tony Cho wrote:
+static u32 get_id_from_handler(tstrWILC_WFIDrv *handler)
+{
+ u32 id;
+
+ if (!handler)
+ return 0;
+
+ for (id = 0; id < NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC; id++) {
+ if (wfidrv_list[id] == handler) {
+ id += 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (id > NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC)
+ return 0;
+ else
+ return id;
+}
+
This still has an off by one bug. Just use zero offset arrays
throughout.
static int get_id_from_handler(tstrWILC_WFIDrv *handler)
{
int id;
if (!handler)
return -ENOBUFS;
for (id = 0; id < NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC; id++) {
if (wfidrv_list[id] == handler)
return id;
}
return -ENOBUFS;
}
Thanks for your review. The return value of this function has from 0 till 2.
1 and 2 value is real ID value. only 0 value is reserved to remove a
registered id.
But I also think that error handling should be added about the
overflowed value
as your opinion.
+static tstrWILC_WFIDrv *get_handler_from_id(u32 id)
+{
+ if (id > 0 && id <= NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC)
+ return wfidrv_list[id - 1];
+ else
+ return NULL;
+}
static tstrWILC_WFIDrv *get_handler_from_id(int id)
{
if (id < 0 || id >= NUM_CONCURRENT_IFC)
return NULL;
return wfidrv_list[id];
}
regards,
dan carpenter
Regards.
Johnny Kim.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
