On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:00:24PM -0400, Benjamin Romer wrote: > From: Tim Sell <timothy.s...@unisys.com> > > The code that tests for high and low xmit watermarks was consolidated and > simplified. The output behavior should be identical, with the exception > of an off-by-one error being corrected in the tests done when the counters > overflowed. > > Note that the literals passed to max() macros need to be explicitly > specified as unsigned long (UL), in order to prevent gcc warnings: > > warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
You do know about max_t(), right? Please redo this with that call instead of the odd casting. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
