From: Tim Sell <timothy.s...@unisys.com>
Looks like an errant patch fitting caused us to redundantly allocate the
workqueues at both the beginning and end of visornic_init(). This was
corrected by removing the allocations at the beginning.
Signed-off-by: Tim Sell <timothy.s...@unisys.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.ro...@unisys.com>
---
drivers/staging/unisys/visornic/visornic_main.c | 12 ------------
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visornic/visornic_main.c
b/drivers/staging/unisys/visornic/visornic_main.c
index de05ac7..2ff7f2f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visornic/visornic_main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visornic/visornic_main.c
@@ -2127,18 +2127,6 @@ static int visornic_init(void)
struct dentry *ret;
int err = -ENOMEM;
- /* create workqueue for serverdown completion */
- visornic_serverdown_workqueue =
- create_singlethread_workqueue("visornic_serverdown");
- if (!visornic_serverdown_workqueue)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- /* create workqueue for tx timeout reset */
- visornic_timeout_reset_workqueue =
- create_singlethread_workqueue("visornic_timeout_reset");
- if (!visornic_timeout_reset_workqueue)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
visornic_debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("visornic", NULL);
if (!visornic_debugfs_dir)
return err;
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
