On 25/06/15 12:14, Maninder Singh wrote:
pci_dev_put checks for NULL pointer itself, reported by coccinelleSigned-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder...@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Yogesh Gaur <yn.g...@samsung.com> --- v2: changelog typo cehcks -> checks drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c index fb3043d..19b5806 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/adl_pci9118.c @@ -1717,8 +1717,7 @@ static void pci9118_detach(struct comedi_device *dev) pci9118_reset(dev); comedi_pci_detach(dev); pci9118_free_dma(dev); - if (pcidev) - pci_dev_put(pcidev); + pci_dev_put(pcidev); } static struct comedi_driver adl_pci9118_driver = {
The patch does no harm, but as mentioned by Dan Carpenter, if pcidev could be NULL (which it could be), we should keep the test for readability.
-- -=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbo...@mev.co.uk> )=- -=( Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/ )=- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
