On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:14:49AM +0000, Abdul, Hussain (H.) wrote:
> This patch add IRQF_ONESHOT flag in threaded IRQs request without a primary
> handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abdul Hussain <hab...@visteon.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> index 0f524bb..7caaae0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int synaptics_rmi4_probe
> rmi4_data->number_of_interrupt_register);
> retval = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL,
> synaptics_rmi4_irq,
> - platformdata->irq_type,
> + platformdata->irq_type | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> DRIVER_NAME, rmi4_data);
> if (retval) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to get attn irq %d\n",
Have you tested this? This changes the behavior of the code, right?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
