On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:02:06PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:27:35AM +0000, Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.) 
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 01:12:18PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:41:52AM +0000, Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath 
> > > (H.) wrote:
> > > > From: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hguju...@visteon.com>
> > > > 
> > > > This trivial patch removes temporary variable to check return value of
> > > > a function and checks return value directly.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This isn't an improvement.  We want to adopt normal kernel error codes
> > > every where but this code moves us backward.
> > > 
> > > regards,
> > > dan carpenter
> > > 
> > 
> > Dan yes this doesn't make any improvement.The 'retval' variable was used
> > only at this place so removed it. This 'retval' value is not returned as
> > well in this function.
> 
> It's not returned but it probably should be eventually.  Also the
> original code is slightly easier to read.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

Fine Dan,lets discard this patch.I agree with you.

Thanks & Regards,
Hari Prasath
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to